Velishka v. City of Nashua & Nashua Housing Authority
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
One of the primary purposes and powers of any housing authority under R. L., c. 169, as amended, in effecting a redevelopment project is to acquire “blighted areas.” Laws 1947, c. 210, s. 2. These are defined in section 2 (1) “as areas (including slum areas) with buildings or improvements which, by reason of dilapidation, obsolescence, overcrowding, faulty arrangement or design, lack of ventilation, light and sanitary facilities, excessive land coverage, deleterious land use or obsolete layout, or any combination of these or other factors, are detrimental to the safety, health, morals, or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Kaskel v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- City of Cleveland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Zurn v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Allydonn Realty Corp. v. Holyoke Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Davis v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Martin v. North Carolina Housing CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Redevelopment Commission v. Security National Bank of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Velishka v. NASHUA HOUSING AUTHORITYSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954
- Annbar Associates v. West Side Redevelopment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.