Legal Opinion

Bradley Bieganski v. David Shinn, et al.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 19, 2026No. 2:21-cv-01684Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Bradley Bieganski, No. CV-21-01684-PHX-DWL 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11 v. 12 David Shinn, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Petitioner Bradley Bieganski’s “renewed motion to 16 enforce the mandate.” (Doc. 49.) For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted in part 17 and denied in part—the Court now issues a conditional writ of habeas corpus under which 18 Bieganski may be retried. 19 BACKGROUND 20 Following a 2017 trial in Arizona state court, Bieganski was convicted of three 21…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API