Legal Opinion

Daniel P. Millikan v. Lori A. Eifrid

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 2012No. 92A03-1109-PL-433PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

In this case, the trial court properly determined that the plaintiff was the bona fide and innocent purchaser for value of a parcel of property when applying the doctrine of equitable subrogation. Thus, title to the property awarded to the plaintiff is superior to any right, title, or interest that might be claimed by the defendant or his successors in interest. However, because the trial court determined that the defendant had not committed fraud that might otherwise have entitled the plaintiff to recover her attorney fees, we reverse that portion of the judgment and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bank of New York v. NallyIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Zukerman v. MontgomeryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Nelson v. MarchandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Skweres v. Diamond Craft Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John P. Schaub v. The Estate of Edward G. Schaub and David Schaub, Personal RepresentativeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Susan Tennant v. Peaks & Valleys, Inc., and Toni Staples (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API