Legal Opinion
Joseph Maquade Chesley v. City of Mesquite, et al.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided February 19, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00218Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Joseph Maquade Chesley, Case No. 2:25-cv-00218-APG-MDC 4 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND 5 vs. (ECF NO. 68) 6 City of Mesquite, et al., 7 Defendants. 8 Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (ECF No. 68) (“Motion”). Plaintiff 9 seeks to amend his current Amended Complaint (ECF No. 30). The Court GRANTS the Motion for the 10 reasons below. 11 DISCUSSION 12 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 13 Plaintiff filed his first complaint against defendants on February 3, 2025, alleging that defendants 14 were liable under an array…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.