Legal Opinion

Adjusta Co. v. Alma Mfg. Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 22, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

This motion is granted, to the extent of allowing an injunction pendente lite against the plaintiff and the other persons mentioned in the order to show cause, restraining them from falsely advising the trade in which both parties to this litigation are engaged, by letter, circular, or advertisement, or in any other manner whatever, as to any steps taken, decisions made, or matters of any kind arising in this cause.

The necessity for this injunction arises from the following circumstances:

Mr. Iked Hirsh, the secretary and treasurer of the plaintiff, through alleged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  2. Emack v. KaneUnited States Circuit Court · 1888
  3. Asbestos Shingle, Slate & Sheathing Co. v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp. v. DoryDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  2. Waco-Porter Corporation v. Tubular Structures Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API