Legal Opinion
Schiele v. Charles Vogel Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 23, 1992No. Civ. 4-90-591PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint and defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Based on a review of the file, record and proceedings herein, the court grants plaintiff’s motion to amend, and grants in part and denies in part defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Nancy C. Schiele (“Schiele”) brings the present action against defendants H. Charles Vogel, Jr. (“Vogel”), Harvey Vogel Manufacturing Co. and Charles Vogel Manufacturing Co., Inc. (referred to collectively as defendants). Schiele is a resident…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Susan Waltman v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McKenzie v. Lunds, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Brown v. Polk County, IowaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1992
- Brekke v. City of BlackduckDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Neppl v. Signature Flight Support Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
- Wickenhauser v. Edward D. Jones & Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.