Legal Opinion
State v. McDowell, 06ca136 (7-23-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 23, 2007No. 06CA136PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant Daniel McDowell appeals the October 20, 2006 judgment of the Licking County Court of Common Pleas denying Appellant's Motion to Vacate a Void Sentence. Appellee is the State of Ohio.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE
{¶ 2} On November 12, 2002, Appellant entered a plea of no contest to the charges of Aggravated Robbery, a first-degree felony in violation of R.C. 2911.01(A)(1); Aggravated Burglary, a first-degree felony in violation of R.C. 2911.11(A)(2); Robbery, a third-degree felony in violation of R.C. 2911.02(A)(3); Firearm Specification to Counts 1 through 3,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MilanovichOhio Supreme Court · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Fanaro, 2007ca137 (10-24-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. McDowell, 2008-Ca-0110 (3-16-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009