Legal Opinion

State v. McDowell, 2008-Ca-0110 (3-16-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2009No. 2008-CA-0110Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Daniel McDowell appeals the August 5, 2008 judgment entry of the Licking County Court of Common Pleas which after, a new sentencing hearing, re-sentenced him in order to advise him of mandatory post-release control terms and conditions. Appellee is the State of Ohio.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE

{¶ 2} On November 12, 2002, appellant entered a plea of no contest to the charges of Aggravated Robbery, a first-degree felony in violation of R.C. 2911.01(A)(1); Aggravated Burglary, a first-degree felony in violation of R.C. 2911.11(A)(2); Robbery, a third-degree…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. SimpkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API