Legal Opinion

Gofor Oil, Inc. v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1988No. Civ. 870371PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff-Appellant Gofor Oil, Inc., appeals from a judgment granting summary judgment to the State of North Dakota and Heidi Heitkamp, North Dakota State Tax Commissioner.

Gofor Oil owns the entire working interest in several oil wells collectively referred to as the “East Flaxton-Madison” (EFM) unit. The focus of this appeal is whether or not the oil produced from the East Flax-ton-Madison unit was properly subjected to the “oil extraction tax” from January 1, 1981, to August 1, 1986. We conclude the EFM unit was properly taxed under the oil extraction tax and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hartpence v. Youth Forestry CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Law Enforcement Standards Board v. Village of Lyndon StationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. CummingsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Reiling v. BhattacharyyaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. DavenportNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Midwest Property Recovery, Inc. v. Job Service of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Crandall v. CrandallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. True v. HeitkampNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Pember v. ShapiroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API