Legal Opinion
United States Bank v. City of Kendall
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas
Decided June 6, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Action by the United States Bank against the City of Kendall. On motion of J. E. Johnson to set aside the service.
1Opinion of the Court
PHILIPS, District Judge.
The plaintiff brought an action in assumpsit against the defendant, a municipal corporation of Hamilton county, Kan., to recover judgment on certain improvement bonds and coupons issued by it. Writ of summons was duly issued thereon, directed to the United States marshal of this district, who made the following return thereon:
“Received the within writ March 21, 1908, and served the same upon the within-named city of Kendall, in the county of Hamilton, in the state of Kansas, by delivering to J. E. Johnson, mayor, personally, a true and certified copy of this writ with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mumma v. Potomac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Life Ass'n of America v. FassettIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Bronson v. La Crosse & Milwaukie RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Thornton v. Marginal Freight Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- American Express Co. v. HaggardIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Lavaysse v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Union Carbide Corporation v. Filtrol CorporationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Garaventa Land & Livestock Co. v. Second Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 1942
- Everett v. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949