Legal Opinion

Haralson v. Walker

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 15, 1861PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Prairie Circuit Court. Hon. John 0. Olendenin, Circuit Judge. The second plea was clearly good. Haralson’s bond did not bind him to deliver the negro, if dead. The act of God or the public enemies always did excuse the performance of a covenant, if it thereby became impossible. Ch. on Con. 635; Shep. Touch. 173, 382; The People vs. Manning, 8 Orneen, 297; 4 Picfc. 101; 19 John. Pep. 44.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fairchild

The plaintiffs, appellees here, and Haralson, the appellant, had demands against John W. Walton, and for their satisfaction had, in some way not shown, got control of a negro girl, Violet, and Haralson took her into possession. Violet was, however, claimed by Cynthia Sloan, who was asserting the claim by suit in the circuit court of Marshall county, Mississippi, when Haralson entered into an obligation to the plaintiffs, that if judgment should be obtained for the taking of Violet, he would surrender her to the proper officers, to be applied to its payment, or would pay on the judgment the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pearce v. MaguireSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API