400 Condominium Ass'n v. Gedo
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE JIGANTI
delivered the opinion of the court:
This case involves a declaratory judgment that floors 8 through 39 of a multi-use high-rise building located at 400 East Randolph Street in Chicago were restricted to residential use only. The defendants are doctors who own condominium units on floors 8 through 39 and use those units to render professional services. The plaintiff, 400 Condominium Association (Association), filed a complaint against the doctors alleging that their business use of the units violated section 21 of the “Declaration of Condominium Ownership,” which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lakeland Property Owners Ass'n v. LarsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Freehling v. Development Management Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Cimino v. DillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thomas v. Virgin Islands Board of Land Use AppealsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Vandelogt v. BrachAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Wood v. Evergreen Condominium Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
- Vandelogt v. Brach Modification of October 15, 2001, opinion on denial of rehearingAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001