Legal Opinion

400 Condominium Ass'n v. Gedo

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 11, 1989No. 1—87—3390PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE JIGANTI

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case involves a declaratory judgment that floors 8 through 39 of a multi-use high-rise building located at 400 East Randolph Street in Chicago were restricted to residential use only. The defendants are doctors who own condominium units on floors 8 through 39 and use those units to render professional services. The plaintiff, 400 Condominium Association (Association), filed a complaint against the doctors alleging that their business use of the units violated section 21 of the “Declaration of Condominium Ownership,” which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lakeland Property Owners Ass'n v. LarsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Freehling v. Development Management Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Cimino v. DillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Virgin Islands Board of Land Use AppealsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  2. Vandelogt v. BrachAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Wood v. Evergreen Condominium Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  4. Vandelogt v. Brach Modification of October 15, 2001, opinion on denial of rehearingAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API