Legal Opinion

Wheatfall v. Board of Regents of the University System

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided March 31, 2014No. Civil Action File No. 1:12-cv-922-TCBPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TIMOTHY C. BATTEN, SR., District Judge.

This Title VII retaliation case is before the Court on Plaintiff Faye Wheatfall’s objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [71]. The magistrate judge recommends granting the motion for summary judgment of Defendant Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia [58].

I. Facts

A. Background

Faye Wheatfall was employed by the Georgia Institute of Technology from 2001 until January 5, 2010.1 In February 2005, her title became “Accountant III,” and her “working title” when her employment ended was “foreign national tax…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ellison v. City of BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2016
  2. Aaron v. Board of Regents of University System of GeorgiaDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2014
  3. Perkins v. LynchDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2016
  4. Riggin v. United States, Department of the Air ForceDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2017
  5. BRYANT v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROADDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API