Legal Opinion
Counter v. United Van Lines, Inc.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided August 7, 1996No. 2:95-cv-00320PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SESSIONS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs move to remand this action to state court, and defendants move to dismiss the action, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants plaintiffs’ motion for remand.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs brought this action in state court in Vermont, seeking damages that allegedly resulted from defendants’ wrongful failure to carry out an agreement to assist them in moving from their home in Calais, Vermont to Virginia. In the complaint plaintiffs filed in Washington Superior Court,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Brown v. American Transfer & Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Edward and Nancy Hughes v. United Van Lines, Inc., and 291 Sisser Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bear MGC Cutlery Co. v. Estes Express Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2001
- Lamm v. Bekins Van Lines Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
- Mayflower Transit, Inc. v. DavenportIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Alitalia v. Arrow Trucking Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 1997
- Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc. v. KLLM, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.