Legal Opinion

State v. Harcombe

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1916No. 2910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Second District; Hon. J. A. Howell, Judge. William W. Harcombe was convicted of embezzlement and be appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of embezzlement, and appeals. '

In the information it is charged:

“The defendant, William W. Harcombe, on or about the month of February or March, 1915, at Ogden City, Weber County, State of Utah, he then and there being the agent and clerk of C. A. Boyd, J. H. De Vine, and Royal Eccles, copart-ners doing business under the name and style of Boyd, De Vine & Eccles, did fraudulently appropriate to his own use and secrete with a fraudulent intent to .appropriate to his own use money in the amount of $375.00, which had come into his control by virtue of his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. McKinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State v. KrugWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State v. MispagelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BurnettUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. StrykerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. State v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API