Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Alexander

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 29, 1927Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : I am unable to agree with the opinion of Mr. Justice Blease in this case and will state the grounds of my dissent. This is an indictment under Section 459 of the Criminal Code, against the defendant, for embezzlement, while acting as County Treasurer of Oconee County. He was tried before his Honor, Judge Bonham, convicted and sentenced, and has appealed to this Court. The statute under which the indictment was presented reads thus:

“All officers * * * charged with the safekeeping, transfer and disbursements of any public funds, who shall embezzle the same, shall be deemed guilty…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. MispagelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Beasley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  4. Meek v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  5. State v. BaumhagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API