Legal Opinion
Hoyt v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 25, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution and Federal civil rights violations, the defendants City of New York, New York City Police Department, Stephen Chmil, and Joseph Cummings appeal, and the defendants New York City Housing Authority and Miguel Hernandez separately appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated July 17, 2000, and (2), as limited by their respective briefs, from so much of an amended order of the same court, dated July 19, 2000, as denied their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Colon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Burt v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Berman v. ForresterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Kandekore v. Town of GreenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Gagnon v. Village of Cooperstown, N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- James v. FlynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Rapuzzi v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Grucci v. GrucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011