Legal Opinion

Smith v. Neufeld

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1899No. 8705PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Hamilton county. Heard below before Sedgwick, J. References: Roberts v. Robinson, 49 Neb. 717; Corey v. Plummer, 48 Neb. 481; Mansfield v. Gregory, 11 Neb. 297; Galway v. MalcJiow, 7 Neb. 285; Dorsey v. Ball, 7 Neb. 460; Berkley v. Lamb, 8 Neb. 399; Hoy v. Anderson, 39 Neb. 386; Mundt v. Ragcdorn, 49 Neb. 409; Giles v. Miller, 36 Neb. 346; Schriber v. Plait, 19 Neb. 625; Baumann v. Frame, 37 Neb. 807; If ooper v. Casietter, 45 Neb. 67; Foeth…

Read the full summary

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, C.

In this case there were two defendants in the district court of Hamilton county. A demurrer to the petition filed by each of them was sustained, and accordingly there was a judgment in their favor, from which, plaintiff has appealed. This involves a consideration of the averments of the petition, which we shall now undertake.

Jerome H. Smith, the plaintiff, alleged in his petition that on October 23, 1894, and for more than five years prior to that date, Tobias Votli was the owner in fee simple of five separately described governmental subdivisions of land in Hamilton county, of which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Corey v. Schuster, Hingston & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
Hoy v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
Irwin v. LewisMississippi Supreme Court · 1874
Conklin v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
Corey v. Plummer, Perry & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

Rakow v. TateNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
Johnson v. SamuelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
Meyer v. PlattNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
France v. HohnbaumNebraska Supreme Court · 1905