Legal Opinion

Besse v. Pellochoux

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1874PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of LaSalle county; the Hon. Edwin S. Leland, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

In 1850, at the residence of the parties in Switzerland, appellant entered into an ante-nuptial agreement with Marie Elizabeth Pellochoux, whom he afterwards married. It was executed and attested with all the usual formalities, and was doubtless valid by the laws of the canton where it was made.

The three principal paragraphs are as follows:

“ 1st. The future husband associates and renders his future wife partaker of half the property acquired during their marriage.
“ 2d. The furniture of the contracting parties once inherited and inventoried, will be confounded and divisible into two equal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Castro v. IlliesTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Lyon v. KnottMississippi Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Le Breton v. MilesNew York Court of Chancery · 1840

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Polson v. StewartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Roth v. RothIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Long v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kleb v. KlebNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
  5. Harrall v. WallisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API