Legal Opinion

Kleb v. Kleb

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 23, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On bill for specific performance of an antenuptial agreement.

1Opinion of the Court

Stevens, Y. C.

This is a bill to compel the performance of an antenuptial agreement, made between the complainant and her late husband, Peter Ivleb. The defendants are his heirs-at-law.

The agreement was made at Hanau, in the year 1861, in the then electorate of Hesse Cassel. The original, signed by the parties and their parents, is contained in a court record of the town, and is translated as follows:

“Marriage Record, 1861, page 532. Hanau, this 29th day of April, 1861. In the presence of Assessor of the Court (acting judge) Schmedes. Clerk of the Court Michael. There appeared as the persons…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Decouche v. SavetierNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  2. Castro v. IlliesTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Le Breton v. MilesNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
  4. Long v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Fuss v. FussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burr v. BloomsburgNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  2. Skewes-Cox v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  3. Mitchell v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API