Legal Opinion
Dries v. Sprinklr Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided February 11, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00047Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 JOSEPH DRIES, 9 Plaintiff, Case No. C20-47-MLP 10 v. ORDER 11 SPRINKLR, INC., a Delaware corporation., 12 Defendant. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Sprinklr, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) “Motion to 16 Strike Request for Exemplary Damages and to Bifurcate Liability and Damages” (“Defendant’s 17 Motion”). (Def.’s Mot. (Dkt. # 92).) Plaintiff Joseph Dries (“Plaintiff”) opposes Defendant’s 18 Motion (Pl.’s Resp. (dkt. # 106), and Defendant submitted a reply (Def.’s Reply (dkt. #…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kelly Koerner v. George A. GrigasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Diane MILLER and Pamela Lewis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FAIRCHILD INDUSTRIES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.