Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Twitchell v. Saferin (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 2018No. 2018-1238Published

1DissentFischer, J.

{¶ 43} I respectfully dissent and would hold that portions of 2016 Sub.H.B. No. 463 ("H.B. 463") are unconstitutional for the reasons stated in my separate opinion in State ex rel. Khumprakob v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections , 153 Ohio St.3d 581, 2018-Ohio-1602, 109 N.E.3d 1184, ¶ 42 (Fischer, J., concurring in judgment only).

I. The Constitutionality of R.C. 3501.11(K) Is Ripe for Review

{¶ 44} As I have previously discussed, I believe that R.C. 3501.11(K) contains language raising separation-of-powers concerns. See, e.g. , State ex rel. Bolzenius v. Preisse , 155 Ohio St.3d 45,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In re J.V.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Akron City School District Board of Education v. Summit County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State ex rel. McGinty v. Cleveland City School District BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Thompson v. SponOhio Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API