Legal Opinion

Truax v. Em Industries, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1995No. C-940623PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shannon, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Dorothy Truax, was employed by EM Science, a division of defendant-appellee, EM Industries, Inc. On July 6, 1993, she filed an application for workers’ compensation benefits for an injury which allegedly occurred on June 28, 1993. Subsequently, EM Science discharged appellant for filing a fraudulent workers’ compensation claim.

Appellant filed a grievance pursuant to the collective-bargaining agreement between her union and EM Science, which provides that an employee may only be discharged for “just cause.” The agreement defines a grievance as “a dispute…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peters v. Rivers Edge Mining, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Thomas v. General Electric Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Wilson v. Glastic CorporationOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Chattree v. ChattreeOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Muldowney v. Portage Cty., Ohio Board of Cty. CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API