Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Urban

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided June 12, 1997No. 13-95-569-CVPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

Milton and Carol Hartman sued Larry and Eugene Urban, individually and as partners in the partnership known as Urban Engineering, to recover damages for making an alleged misrepresentation in a plat of a subdivision lot which they purchased. The trial court granted summary judgment for Urban, along with sanctions against the Hartmans for bringing a frivolous lawsuit. By two points of error, the Hartmans challenge the granting of the summary judgment and the award of sanctions. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Padre Island Investment Corporation hired Urban to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Riddick v. Quail Harbor Condominium Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  2. Boren v. Bullen, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  3. Dagley v. Haag Engineering Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  4. Garcia v. Schwab, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  5. Pisharodi v. Barrash, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API