Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Hughes

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1924No. Civil No. 2091PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Superior Judge.

— The appellee brought action against the appellants to recover from the appellants a balance due for pasturage and feed furnished and sold by the appellee to the appellant Holmes for the use of the cattle of the appellant Holmes. The issues were tried to a jury, and judgment upon a general verdict rendered by the court against the appellant in the sum of $1,998.15. While the appellant Holmes has joined in the appeal, the judgment as to him is not questioned, but the errors assigned affect only the appellant Farmers & Merchants’ Bank. The allegations of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fullam v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
  2. Barnard v. German American SeminaryMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Rogers v. Empkie Hardware Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Frohardt Bros. v. DuffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Oleson v. OlesonNebraska Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moon v. ErvinIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Gutknecht v. Muscoda State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API