Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 16, 2000No. C5-99-1416PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge.

Appellant Douglas Wayne Young was tried on three counts of criminal sexual conduct. The jury informed the court that it could reach unanimous verdicts on two counts but not on the third and asked if that could be “a final outcome?”- When the court instructed the jury that it could not, the jury returned verdicts of guilty on all counts.

At the sentencing, the court did not offer to Young an opportunity for allocution.

Young assigns as errors on appeal the trial court’s refusal to permit a deadlock as to one count and the failure to offer an opportunity for allocution.' We…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. State v. BuggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. State v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Searles v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API