Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kowalski v. Wojtkowski

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 27, 1955Published

1Dissent

William J. Brennan, Jr., J.

(dissenting). I think the first count, pleading an alleged cause of action under the Florida bastardy statute, was properly dismissed. The generally accepted rule that no action is maintainable on a foreign bastardy statute applies. I dissent, however, from the conclusion reached by my colleagues that the action pleaded in the second count, grounded on N. J. 8. A. 9:16-1 et seq., is not maintainable by this plaintiff.

This is not a case concerning the legitimacy of children born to a couple whose form of marriage (a common law marriage, for example) is recognized…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Watson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Carroll v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. State v. ReedWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API