City of Celina v. Dynavest Joint Venture
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. ALAN WALDROP, Justice.
The City of Celina and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (“TCEQ”) challenge the trial court’s denial of portions of their pleas to the jurisdiction. Appellants contend that the trial court lacks jurisdiction over Dynavest Joint Venture’s petition for a declaratory judgment because the petition is an impermissible collateral attack based on a statute that does not apply to the TCEQ’s action. We affirm the challenged portions of the district court’s order.
The City of Celina filed an application with the TCEQ on September 2, 2003, seeking amendment of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Director of the Department of Agriculture & Environment v. Printing Industries Ass'n of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Hendee v. Dewhurst, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rusk State Hospital v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- in Re Sustainable Texas Oyster Resource Management, L.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2019
- Employees Retirement System of Texas v. Putnam, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- Rusk State Hospital v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. v. Harris County, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.