Legal Opinion

Employees Retirement System of Texas v. Putnam, LLC

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided July 30, 2009No. 03-08-00473-CVPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING

DIANE M. HENSON, Justice.

We withdraw our opinion dated July 15, 2009, and substitute the following in its place. The Employees Retirement System of Texas (“ERS”) brought suit against appellees Putnam, LLC, d/b/a Putnam Investments; Putnam Investment Management, LLC (“PIM”); and Putnam Advisory Company, LLC (“PAC”) for fraud, fraudulent inducement, breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, and tortious interference with prospective business relations. 1 The trial court disposed of ERS’s claims by granting a series of summary-judgment motions, ultimately ruling that ERS take…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. Paul Reed HarperTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. City of New Braunfels, Texas v. Carowest Land, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2014
  3. S & I Management, Inc. v. Sungju Choi, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  4. Leach v. TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
  5. University Interscholastic League v. Southwest Officials Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API