Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. Bleeker
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEnoch, Justice
This ease concerns Ronnie Dale Bleeker’s claim for damages from Trinity Universal Insurance Company (Trinity) under the Stowers doctrine and the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA). Bleeker alleges that Trinity is liable because it did not settle third-party claims against him, thereby exposing him to a judgment in excess of his policy limits. Because we hold that the third party did not offer to release Bleeker fully, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment on these two issues and render judgment that Bleeker take nothing.
I. Facts
Tragically, on July 14, 1990, Bleeker was drunk and chose…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
- American Physicians Insurance Exchange v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. SorianoTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Bleeker v. Villarreal, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
3Cited by34 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. LedesmaTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Roy Seger v. Yorkshire Insurance Co., Ltd., and Ocean Marine Insurance Co., Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
- Southern County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ochoa, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Watters v. Guaranty National InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Archer v. Medical Protective Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.