People v. Haines
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of conviction of the crime of rape. Objection is strongly urged against the ruling of the trial court in denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. Defendant urged his motion for a new trial upon the ground that judgment had not been pronounced within the time provided by section 1191 and, therefore, he was entitled to a new trial under the provisions of section 1202 of the Penal Code.
The verdict of the jury was rendered on March 24th; sentence was continued until March 28th. At that time notice of motion for new trial was given and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. ZuvelaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. AnthonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Stoakes v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. RubensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- In Re MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. MimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Wagner v. WagnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.