Legal Opinion

People v. Haines

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1923No. Crim. No. 1081PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of conviction of the crime of rape. Objection is strongly urged against the ruling of the trial court in denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. Defendant urged his motion for a new trial upon the ground that judgment had not been pronounced within the time provided by section 1191 and, therefore, he was entitled to a new trial under the provisions of section 1202 of the Penal Code.

The verdict of the jury was rendered on March 24th; sentence was continued until March 28th. At that time notice of motion for new trial was given and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. ZuvelaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. People v. AnthonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Stoakes v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. RubensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. In Re MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. People v. MimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. People v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Wagner v. WagnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API