Legal Opinion

Wellsville East Field Irr. Co. v. Lindsay Land & Livestock Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1943No. 6404PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Chief Justice.

The background facts are set out in full in the opinion reported in 104 Utah 448, 137 P. 2d 634. The evidence clearly shows that Nichols claimed the right to divert water from two points on Davenport Creek, which was a tributary to Little Bear River. Between his points of diversion and the plaintiffs’ dam, where they take substantially all of the water from Little Bear and turn it into private canals, there apparently are several others who divert small quantities. Plaintiffs, on petition for rehearing, contend that there is not sufficient evidence to show that they were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Wyoming Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Wellsville East Field Irr. Co. v. Lindsay Land & Livestock Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Smith v. North Canyon Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Spring Creek Irr. Co. v. ZollingerUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Ephraim Willow Creek Irr. Co. v. OlsonUtah Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Drainage Area of Bear River in Rich CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Rich County-Otter Creek Irrigation Co. v. LambornUtah Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API