Legal Opinion
Stephen Lawrence v. Thomas Michael Flohr
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 2025No. 1:23-cv-09844Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK STEPHEN LAWRENCE, Plaintiff, 23-cv-9844 (SHS) (KHP) -v- OPINION & ORDER THOMAS MICHAEL FLOHR, Defendant. SIDNEY H. STEIN, U.S. District Judge. Plaintiff Stephen Lawrence has moved to dismiss defendant Thomas Michael Flohr’s counterclaim for indemnification of attorneys’ fees Flohr may incur in connection with this action. That motion is granted and the counterclaim is dismissed because the escrow agreement upon which the counterclaim is based does not provide for indemnification of Flohr’s attorneys’ fees in suits, such as this one,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Faber v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- LAW DEBENTURE TRUST CO. OF NY. v. Maverick Tube Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.