Legal Opinion

Haines v. Cochran Bros.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts of the ease are fully stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Snyder, Judge:

Writ of error to a judgment of the circuit court oiPleas-ants county rendered June 16, 1883, in an action of trover brought by Simpson Jones and Ralph Haines, partners as Jones & Haines against John, Park and Joseph Cochran, partners as Cochran Brothers, for the conversion of 80,000 oil barrel staves of the value of $2,000.00. There was atrial by jury and a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs for $699.35, on which the said judgment was rendered. The defendants' have brought this writ of error.

The plaintiffs read in evidence a written contract between themselves and the defendant,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Owens v. WeedmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Newsum v. NewsumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1829
  3. Parkhurst v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thompson Development, Inc. v. Kroger Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hinkle Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Bowles Rice McDavid Graff & Love LLPDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2009
  3. Shamblin's Ready Mix, Inc. v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  4. Fruth, Inc. v. Cardinal Health, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2024
  5. Integrity Coal Sales, Inc. v. Avani Resources PTE, LTDDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API