Legal Opinion
United States v. Harry Thomas (79-5271) and Anthony L. Romano (79-5175)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 23, 1984No. 79-5175/5271PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Harry Thomas was convicted after a jury trial of one count of transporting fraudulently obtained money in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 and 2 (“Count 9”) and one count of conspiracy to commit bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1014 (“Count 10”). In the same trial, appellant Anthony Romano was also convicted of conspiracy to commit bank fraud (“Count 10”). On appeal from these convictions appellants assign as error the following points: (1) the district court erred in permitting their retrial after a mistrial had…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. HoffaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Robert Earl BessCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Joseph Lichenstein and Leo BellaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. Richard CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Phillips v. Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. George E. Moore (88-5932) and Charles R. Morse, (88-5942)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Matthew Pritchett v. Terry Pitcher, Respondent-Appellant,cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Najib Mansour Atisha (85-1537), Michael Covintgon (85-1775), DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.