Legal Opinion

Alabama Great Southern Ry. Co. v. Norrell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 6, 1932No. 7 Div. 86PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was upon count 5, 'by the administrator of the deceased, for death from personal injury, the result of a head-on collision between .two of defendant’s motorcars engaged in interstate commerce. Special damages were claimed for “the loss of the care, attention, instruction, training, advice and guidance which they would have received during their minority from their father, Robert Norrell, if he had not been killed as aforesaid.” The defendant’s pleas were the general issue and assumption of risk.

The complaint, alleging that deceased was an employee of defendant and engaged in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MoserSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MillonasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HollowaySupreme Court of the United States · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Snellings v. Builders' Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Chapman v. Rivers Construction CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Chapman v. Rivers Construction CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API