Legal Opinion
State v. . Wentz
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 27, 1918PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The prisoner was indicted for the murder of William Wentz, and convicted of murder in the second degree. When the case was called in this Court, counsel of the prisoner very frankly withdrew all assignments of error, as untenable, except three, which were reserved, as follows:
"1. The first of these is, that the court charged the jury as follows: `The prisoner has testified in his own behalf. You are to scrutinize his evidence — that is, examine it closely and carefully to ascertain whether you shall believe it. The same applies to the testimony of any of his near relations. The same principle…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kornegay v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- State v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- State v. . PollardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- State v. . HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State v. . AtwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. SheffieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. . AustonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943