Brentwood Realty Co. v. Moses
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 236, Oct. T., 1919, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Chester County for defendant non obstante veredicto in case of Brentwood Realty Company v. Oliver E. Moses. Assumpsit on contract for sale of real estate. Before Landis, P. J., Second Judicial District, specially presiding. The court directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $890.70 conditional that the plaintiff transfer to the defendant the lots named in the statement by legal deed of conveyance.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 236, Oct. T., 1919, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Chester County for defendant non obstante veredicto in case of Brentwood Realty Company v. Oliver E. Moses. Assumpsit on contract for sale of real estate. Before Landis, P. J., Second Judicial District, specially presiding. The court directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $890.70 conditional that the plaintiff transfer to the defendant the lots named in the statement by legal deed of conveyance. Subsequently, on rule for judgment non obstante veredicto, the court made absolute the rule and judgment was entered in…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Nothing can be added profitably to the concise and well-sustained conclusions reached in the opinion of the learned court below in entering judgment non obstante veredicto. The facts out of which the controversy arises are all in writing and are undisputed.
For the reasons given by the learned trial judge the judgment is affirmed.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Weldon & Kelly Co. v. Pavia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Klugh EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Allegheny Center Associates v. Appliance Store, Inc. (In Re Appliance Store, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Leo P. Rich v. G.W. Pifer SonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Coastwise Lumber & Supply Co. v. StitzingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.