Legal Opinion
Glucose Refining Co. v. City of Chicago
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
Decided May 23, 1905No. 27,599PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOHLSAAT, Circuit Judge.
Prior to March 23, 1903, complainant was the owner of the sugar refining plant in question, situated in the city of Chicago. On that date the city passed an ordinance, section 10 of which, so far as it is pertinent herein, reads as follows:
“The emission of dense smoke from the smokestack of any boat or locomotive, or from any chimney anywhere within the city, shall be deemed and is hereby declared to be, a public nuisance, but no prosecution for the emission of dense smoke shall be commenced, unless within ten-days prior thereto at least three notices shall have been…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Boyce's Executors v. GrundySupreme Court of the United States · 1830
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. RichcreekIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Blount v. Sixteenth St. Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- In Re JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Burk v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Bowers v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.