Legal Opinion
Brandt-Erichsen v. United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 15, 1993No. 91-35835PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Viggo Thor Brandt-Erichsen appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the appellees, the United States Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management and its employees, on the ground that Brandt-Erichsen failed to obtain a “receipt upon final entry” triggering 43 U.S.C. § 1165 and therefore, did not obtain title to an 80-acre tract of land in Alaska. We affirm the district court’s summary judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
Sometime in 1968, Brandt-Erichsen entered an 80-acre tract of land in the Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve in Alaska.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- William Michael Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Micky Joe Vaandering, United States of America v. Jeffrey Wayne McMillanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- New West Materials LLC v. Interior Board of Land AppealsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Viggo Thor Brandt-Erichsen v. United States Department Of The InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993