Legal Opinion

Viggo Thor Brandt-Erichsen v. United States Department Of The Interior

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 15, 1993No. 91-35835Published

1Opinion of the Court

999 F.2d 1376

Viggo Thor BRANDT-ERICHSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND

MANAGEMENT; United States Department of Interior, National

Parks Service; Manuel Lujan, in his official capacity as

Secretary of Interior; Charles Budge, in his official

capacity as Superintendent of the Wrangell-St. Elias

National Park; Richard H. Martin, in his official capacity

as Superintendent of the Wrangell-St. Elias National Park;

William P. Horn, Deputy Secretary of the Department of

Interior in his official capacity; John Tiffany, Inspector

for the Bureau of Land…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. William Michael Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Marathon Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API