George H. Edwards, Jr. v. Stephen Dewalt
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
This habeas appeal ostensibly presents a difficult question of statutory interpretation involving the lingering effects of long-since superseded federal special parole statutes. However, we do not need to reach the question because habeas relief must be denied on the basis of a parole regulation under the regular parole scheme. Petitioner contends that the parole regulation in question illegally circumvents a statutorily required exercise of case-by-case decision-making by the Parole Commission. Because the regulation is a valid across-the-board exercise of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ramsey v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- George H. Edwards, Jr. v. James N. CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Nat'l Org. of Veterans' Advocates, Inc. v. Sec'y AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Bridgeforth v. HoffnerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Chesson v. GilleyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.