Legal Opinion

George H. Edwards, Jr. v. Stephen Dewalt

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 1, 2012No. 09-5533PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

This habeas appeal ostensibly presents a difficult question of statutory interpretation involving the lingering effects of long-since superseded federal special parole statutes. However, we do not need to reach the question because habeas relief must be denied on the basis of a parole regulation under the regular parole scheme. Petitioner contends that the parole regulation in question illegally circumvents a statutorily required exercise of case-by-case decision-making by the Parole Commission. Because the regulation is a valid across-the-board exercise of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  2. George H. Edwards, Jr. v. James N. CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Nat'l Org. of Veterans' Advocates, Inc. v. Sec'y AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  4. Bridgeforth v. HoffnerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  5. Chesson v. GilleyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API