Whitlock v. Michael
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Candler, Justice.
1. The Code, § 110-104, declares: “Where there is no conflict in the evidence, and that introduced, with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom, shall demand a particular verdict, the court may direct the jury to find for the party entitled thereto.” From this it follows, necessarily, that the direction of a verdict is not erroneous where the proved facts, viewed . from every possible legal point of view, can sustain no other finding than that directed. Grace v. Rouse, 202 Ga. 720 (44 S. E. 2d, 762); Cannon v. Heard, 204 Ga. 891 (52 S. E. 2d, 459).
No. 17494. Argued…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McGahee v. McGaheeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Gilmore v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Belt v. GaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Grace v. RouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Holcombe v. StauffacherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jones v. Mayor &C. of AthensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Burger Barn, Inc. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Misfeldt v. Hospital Auth. of City of MariettaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Bridges v. ElrodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Jones v. Mayor &C. of AthensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.