United States v. Kemp
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
DRIBBEN, Judge:
Appellant, pursuant to his pleas, was convicted of four specifications of larceny and three of housebreaking. These offenses were charged as violations of Articles 121 and 130 respectively, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 921 and 930. The approved sentence provides for confinement at hard labor for twelve months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances while in confinement, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade.
I
Appellant first argues that the military judge erred to his substantial prejudice by denying his motion for appropriate…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. CoulterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. AlbrightUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. ClissonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. GreenwaltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. EngleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. McCormickU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. TreadwellU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. BushU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. GrinterU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. HernandezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983