Legal Opinion
Pentax Corporation v. Myhra
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 31, 1995No. 94-35277Published
1Opinion of the Court
61 F.3d 731
17 ITRD 1871, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5949,
95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,210
PENTAX CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Donald W. MYHRA, in his official capacity as District
Director of Customs for the District of Great
Falls, MT; U.S. Customs Service, an
agency of the U.S.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-35277.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 2, 1995.
Decided July 31, 1995.
Charles H. Bayar, Bayar Law Office, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.
E. Roy Hawkens, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees.
Appeal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States of America, and Lummi Indian Tribe, Intervenor-Appellant v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Trayco, Incorporated v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Pentax Corp. v. MyhraDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1994
- Pentax Corp. v. MyhraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995