Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Anaya-Espino

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 2013No. 48,025-KWPublished

1DissentBrown, Chief Judge

J^There have been several Louisiana cases upholding La. R.S. 14:100.13 both before and after the decision in Arizona v. United States, supra. See State v. Lopez, 12-2043 (La.App. 1st Cir.03/21/13), 116 So.3d 1, 2013 WL 1200338, there are two major contexts in which preemption is found. First, express preemption occurs where the federal statute contains explicit preemptive language. Second, there is implied preemption. The court has identified two types of implied preemption: (1) field preemption (a field in which the federal interest is so dominant that the federal system will be assumed to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API