Legal Opinion
Murphy v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 25, 2001No. 3D00-910PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
789 So.2d 1235 (2001)
Timothy MURPHY, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D00-910.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 25, 2001.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Valerie Jonas, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Michael J. Neimand (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and FLETCHER, JJ.
On Agreed Motion For New Trial
2Per curiam
The transcript of the trial in this case contains irremediable and substantial omissions and obvious and egregious errors in the portions which do exist. Moreover, it…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Delap v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Simmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Blasco v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Rozier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Vilsaint v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Scala and Weitz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Hernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- V.T.Z. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002