Legal Opinion

In re C.K.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 8, 1991No. 90-550PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

The State seeks to appeal from an evidentiary ruling in the detention-hearing stage of a CHINS (child in need of care or supervision) proceeding. We dismiss the appeal because it does not satisfy the collateral final order criteria set out in V.R.A.P. 5.1.

*195The following events gave rise to this appeal.1 On November 27, 1990, seven-year-old C.K. informed a school nurse that her father had sexually abused her. After she repeated the allegations to SRS workers and a police officer, a CHINS petition was filed, and she was taken into custody pursuant to an ex parte temporary detention order. See 33…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors in ActionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Weight Watchers of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Weight Watchers International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. Commonwealth of Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc., Federal Power Commission, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re J.G.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. State v. WetherbeeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  3. E.S. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  4. Lamb v. BloomSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  5. In Re CKSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API