Legal Opinion

Belt v. Hilgeman, Brundige Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 5, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Orphans’ Court of Baltimore County. The eausie was submitted to Boyd, O. J., Bnrgoois, Thomas, TTbneb, Stockbridge, Akkiws, and Offutt, JJ.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The appellees filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in this ease on the ground that the appellant did not pay the cost of printing the record within the time required by the rules of this Court, and because of his “failure! to have the appeal ready for argument.” This motion was filed on the 18th of January, 1921, but as the record was printed before the appeal was called for argument on E'ebruary 1st, 1921, the motion must be overruled.

On the 21st of October, 1920, the appellees, as creditors of the estate of 'Susan P. Belt, deceased, filed a petition in the Orphans’ Court of Baltimore County…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Levering v. LeveringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  2. Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  3. Pratt v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  4. Carey v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fulford v. FulfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Kerby v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  3. Goldsborough v. De WittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  4. SMITH, EXEC. v. WallerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  5. Schaumloeffel v. SchaumloeffelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API