Legal Opinion

Crowell v. Donoho

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Livingston Circuit Court. — Mon. Arch B. Mavis, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is a suit on an alleged contract of employment to recover the reasonable value of services rendered by plaintiff as a .physician and surgeon to the adult daughter of defendant. The answer contains a general denial and a plea of res adjudicata. In the view we have of the case it will not be necessary to notice the latter defense.

The cause was tried without the aid of a jury. The court made and filed findings of fact in which the issues of facts raised by the pleadings were decided in favor of defendant. Judgment was rendered accordingly and plaintiff appealed. No declarations of law were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crane v. . BaudouineNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Morrell v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Meisenbach v. Southern Cooperage Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Smith v. WatsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1842
  5. Madden v. BlainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McClenahan v. KeyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. Kramer v. CarrollMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Morfit v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API